why are traditional 2-column proofs important?

…I’ll tell you why. It’s so that we can establish and teach a standard level of logical discourse. These kind of proofs help children learn how to create logical arguments and communicate their findings.

Recently there was a debate among the math teachers in my teaching team about a math problem that some teachers were misinterpreting. Some said that the wording was misleading. Communication is important in math, and there is a standardized logical basis to it. (The answer was 2/3, guys!)

I believe that the Common Core Curriculum Standards do not sufficiently address issues of mathematical reasoning, the need for precision in mathematical discourse, and the role of proof throughout the geometry curriculum. While reading the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, I noticed that the word “logic” is used only once in the entire 93-page document.

The growing appreciation of the important role of exploration with technology, experimentation, and conjecture in mathematical thinking may have obscured the fact that reasoning is the foundation of mathematics. While science verifies through observation, mathematics verifies through logical, deductive reasoning. Students need to be consciously aware of the distinction between exploring topics and providing more rigorous arguments. In particular, they need to use terminology in a precise manner and be able to specify their hypotheses, particularly if these are implicit.

While I fully agree that exploration and application are essential, I see the geometry in Integrated Math 2 as a unique opportunity for an EAB teacher and student to emphasize the way in which pure mathematics works, its foundation on deduction, reasoning, and proof. In fact, I argue that it is the only instance (aside from Computer Programming, if we offered it in a formal course) in which students have the opportunity to use logic to construct a functional system. Logic is a topic in the soon to be abandoned Math Studies course, but the students do not have the opportunity in this course to construct a functional system, instead, they use the concept on a basic knowledge and comprehension level to complete truth tables.

This is my rationale for focusing as intensely as I do on logical reasoning and structured proof.

Phil Simms Jersey